Tag: uip

“In The Age of Aquarius, the Daughters of the Children of the Sun will come to power on the shoulders of Lost Kings. It is then the world will know peace…”

As someone who has spent forty years toggling between guitar solos and routing packets, between the harmony of a chord progression and the precision of a network handshake, the arrival of 3I/ATLAS (also designated C/2025 N1) feels like watching an alien chord change in the cosmic symphony. Here’s a detailed unpacking of what we do know about 3I/ATLAS, what remains puzzling, and how the provocative commentary from astrophysicist Avi Loeb fits (or wildly diverges) from the mainstream view.

---

1. Discovery, Trajectory & Basic Facts

• 3I/ATLAS was discovered on 1 July 2025 by the Asteroid Terrestrial‑impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope in Río Hurtado, Chile. (Astrobiology)
• Its orbit is strongly hyperbolic, meaning it is not bound to the Sun and is passing through the Solar System only once (unless perturbed). (NASA Science Assets)
• Some key numbers: perihelion (q ≈ 1.35) AU, eccentricity ~6.14, and incoming “hyperbolic excess velocity” on the order of ~60 km s⁻¹. (NASA Science)
• Its size is still uncertain: Hubble observations constrain its nucleus to be not more than ~5.6 km diameter (or ~1,444 ft to ~3.5 miles) but some analyses suggest larger bounds (depending on assumptions). (NASA Science)
• Age estimates place its origin at 3-14 billion years ago (outside our Solar System, likely from the Galactic thick disk). (Wikipedia)

As a network engineer, I like to visualize orbit parameters like packet paths in a network topology: this one is clearly “foreign-network traffic” entering our local subnet once, and leaving forever.

---

2. Composition & Activity: What We Observe

From a “music genius” vantage I’m listening for the instrumentation of this comet—what materials, what volatiles, what signals it broadcasts.

CO₂ dominance & water scarcity

• Observations by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) show that the coma (i.e., the gaseous envelope around the nucleus) is strongly dominated by carbon dioxide (CO₂) relative to water (H₂O). Specifically a CO₂/H₂O mixing ratio of ~8.0 ± 1.0 was observed at ~3.32 AU inbound. (arXiv)
• Additionally, the SPHEREx mission detected a CO₂-rich coma extending to at least ~348,000 km in radius. (SPHEREx)
• Water activity was detected via the OH (hydroxyl) emission line using the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory at ~3.51 AU, with a water production rate ~1.35 ± 0.27 × 10²⁷ molecules s⁻¹ (~40 kg/s) and the implication that >20 % of the surface might be active. (arXiv)
• From a chemistry perspective: this is unusual for comets from our Solar System, which typically have much larger proportions of water relative to CO₂ at those distances.

Polarimetric & spectral oddities

• A recent polarimetric study found a “deep and narrow negative polarisation branch” reaching about –2.7% at ~7° phase angle and an inversion angle ~17°. These numbers are outside the usual range for either comets or asteroids. (arXiv)
• Spectroscopy in optical/NIR shows a red slope (~10% per 1000 Å between 0.5-0.8 µm) flattening at longer wavelengths, consistent with ~30 % water-ice grains mixed with a Tagish Lake-type meteorite analog in the coma. (arXiv)

Nickel (Ni) emission and Ni/Fe anomalies

• One of the more striking recent findings: in a paper titled “Extreme Ni I/Fe I abundance ratio in the coma of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS”, observations with ESO’s VLT UVES spectrograph found nickel (Ni I) emission at multiple epochs, but iron (Fe I) only detected at smaller heliocentric distances (≤2.64 AU). The Ni/Fe abundance ratio is exceptionally high compared to solar system comets. (arXiv)
• Independent commentary (by Avi Loeb) points to a hypothesis of nickel tetracarbonyl (Ni(CO)₄) formation as a plausible mechanism for the high Ni and low Fe, describing the pathway as “a process that we can imagine only because it was used in industry”. (Medium)

From a network-engineer’s lens: if typical comets are “broadband traffic” of ice + dust + standard metals, 3I/ATLAS is presenting a weird encrypted packet type with non-standard headers (Ni without Fe, CO₂-rich, unusual tail orientation). As a music lover, it’s like a jazz piece where all your expected cadences are inverted or omitted.

---

3. Why the Speculation? Avi Loeb’s Perspective

Avi Loeb, known for provocative takes (e.g., on 1I/ʻOumuamua), brings forward a series of observations and hypotheses about 3I/ATLAS, some of which are more speculative than mainstream. I’ll lay them out respectfully and then comment with my dual-perspective.

Loeb’s key speculative points:

• He emphasises that the Ni emission without concurrent Fe is unprecedented in known comets, and in his view hints at either exotic chemistry or technological origin. (The Economic Times)
• He highlights the observation of an anti-tail (a tail pointing toward the Sun rather than away) and suggests it might represent a “braking thrust” or active manoeuvre rather than purely sublimation. (New York Post)
• He uses what he calls the “Loeb Scale” of object-origin likelihood (0 = natural rock, 10 = confirmed technology) and reportedly assigns 3I/ATLAS a mid-to-high number (though he emphasises it is not definitively artificial). (reddit.com)
• Loeb cautions that if this object is technological, the implications “are so huge for humanity” and that we should maintain open-mindedness. (New York Post)

My commentary (music-meets-network-engineer lens):

• As a musician, I adore thematic deviations: when a piece changes key unexpectedly or introduces an instrumentation you didn’t expect, you pay attention. 3I/ATLAS is that in the cosmic concert: CO₂-rich, Ni-emitting, Fe-lacking, with an odd tail orientation. These are valid anomalies worthy of investigation.
• As a network engineer, I’m sleuthing for protocol anomalies: missing handshake, unexpected payload, odd routing. If a comet is “expected traffic,” this one is more like an unknown protocol or even a disguised spoof.
• But: anomalous ≠ artificial. Cavernous data flows exist in nature; exotic chemistry can arise under unusual formation conditions (e.g., high-radiation environments, low metallicity, unique parent star systems). Loeb is right: we must consider all possibilities, but as an engineer I also demand reproducible logs and error-checking before declaring “foreign packet source.”
• Loeb’s stance: he isn’t (to my reading) claiming it’s alien tech, but rather saying: “Given the oddities, we should remain humble and keep all options open.” That’s healthy scientific posture but inevitably draws sensational headlines.

---

4. Outstanding Questions (and My Speculative Plays)

Here are some of the puzzles I find especially tantalising, with my engineer/harmonist speculation:

Question	What the data shows	My speculative thought
Why such a high CO₂/H₂O ratio?	JWST measured CO₂/H₂O ≈ 8.0 ± 1.0, unusually high for a comet at ~3.3 AU. (arXiv)	Could suggest formation beyond the CO₂ ice-line in its parent system, or heavy radiation exposure depleting H₂O ice. Imagine a string section missing the violins.
Why Ni but little/no Fe?	VLT spectra show Ni emissions at multiple epochs; Fe only appears (if at all) at smaller distances, producing an extreme Ni/Fe ratio. (arXiv)	One speculation: nickel-carbonyl (Ni(CO)₄) or Ni bound organometallics sublimating easily; iron might be locked in larger refractory phases not yet sublimating. In music terms: you’re hearing a drum solo but missing the bass line.
Why an anti-tail / sun-pointing jet?	Observations report a tail (or coma extension) toward the Sun rather than the usual away-from-Sun tail. (IFLScience)	Could be an anisotropic outgassing jet caused by local geometry. Or (speculatively) a manoeuvre-like effect. As an engineer: if the exhaust points toward the Sun, something is intentionally „braking“ the motion relative to solar gravity.
Why no large visible dust tail (yet) or what appear to be standard “comet” features?	Some images show only a faint coma, not a huge dust tail. (Astrobiology)	Perhaps the dust grains are large and not being accelerated by radiation pressure, or sublimation is dominated by CO₂/CO rather than H₂O so the dust dynamics differ. Or the nucleus is so large/massive that dust ejection has less net effect.
What is its origin star/region?	Age estimate 7.6-14 billion years; trajectory from direction of Sagittarius, i.e., near the Galactic centre region for departure. (Wikipedia)	Perhaps formed in a low-metallicity, early-type star system. If so, its chemistry may differ markedly from Solar-System comets, producing the unusual composition.

---

5. My Conclusion: Symphony of the Unknown

From my vantage of forty years of listening to music, learning networks, and reading science, here’s how I frame 3I/ATLAS:

• It is every bit worthy of attention: we are looking not at a run-of-the-mill comet, but at a visitor from another star system, bringing its own “instrumentation” and playing a tune we haven’t heard before.
• The major findings (CO₂-dominance, unusual Ni/Fe, anti-tail) are real and documented in peer-review or arXiv. The anomalies are not just hype.
• That said, the most dramatic speculation (technological origin, alien spacecraft) remains just that—speculation. Good speculation, thought-provoking, but not yet with conclusive evidence.
• I personally lean toward a novel natural object hypothesis: a comet/planetesimal from a very different star system, formed under unusual conditions (different metallicity, different radiation history) so its composition and activity deviate from Solar-System norms. As my music analog: it’s jazz from another planet, not necessarily a beamed-in radio transmission.
• But I also reserve the possibility that if future data reveals genuine manoeuvre-like behaviour (non-gravitational acceleration inconsistent with outgassing, highly directed jets, artificial materials) then we might need to reconsider more exotic scenarios.

---

6. What to Watch Next

If you’re as curious as I am, here are the things I’ll be tuning my sensors (and ears) for:

• High-resolution images from missions (e.g., the HiRISE camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter reportedly imaged 3I/ATLAS near Mars) to better resolve nucleus size, shape, and dust environment. (Daily Galaxy)
• Additional spectroscopic campaigns measuring Ni/Fe, CN, CO, OCS (carbonyl sulphide) and other volatiles as the object approaches perihelion (~29 October 2025) and recedes.
• Precise astrometric tracking to detect non-gravitational acceleration (i.e., residual “thrust” not explained by outgassing) which could hint at active processes.
• Continued polarimetric and dust-tail morphology studies to understand grain size distributions and outgassing geometry.
• Cross-comparison: how does 3I/ATLAS compare with 1I/ʻOumuamua and 2I/Borisov? Are we seeing a spectrum of interstellar visitors or a special outlier?

---

Final Thought

In the grand network of cosmic events, 3I/ATLAS is a rare packet injected into our Solar-System subnet, carrying payloads that challenge expectations. As a musician, I feel the dissonance and want to resolve it into new harmony. As an engineer, I log the anomalies, check the protocols, and await confirmation. Avi Loeb’s voice reminds us: maybe this isn’t just another comet—but until the data plays out, the melody remains unresolved. Either way, being a part of this moment is exhilarating.